Chomsky says. "He was a brutal killer; he had one fixed idea in mind which drove him all his life: a greater Israel, as powerful as possible, as few Palestinians as possible. ... He doubtless showed courage and commitment to pursuing this ideal, which is an ugly and horrific one."
AVI SHLAIM : "[...] And finally, there is Ariel Sharon, who always rejected the Oslo peace process, who as prime minister tried to sweep away the remnants of Oslo and forge a new strategy of unilateralism, of giving up on the Palestinians and redrawing unilaterally the borders of greater Israel. So, his legacy can be summed up in one word—unilateralism—acting in defiance of U.N. resolutions, international law and international public opinion."
RASHID KHALIDI: "Well, for me, the most important emotion is a sense of, finally, the man who carried out a war in which 20,000 people were killed, the Lebanon War of 1982, who besieged Beirut, who destroyed building after building, killing scores of civilians in a search to destroy the PLO leadership, has finally left the world. I was in Beirut that summer of 1982. And I—to me, it’s horrific to watch the hagiographies that are being produced by people like Vice President Biden, by The New York Times, by much of the media, about a man who really should have ended his days at The Hague before the International Criminal Court.
[...] The idea that he is now considered by some to be a peacemaker is grotesque, frankly."
Histoire de rétablir un peu la vérité historique : Ariel Sharon, la fin d'un criminel de guerre ( http://blog.mondediplo.net/2014-01-12-Ariel-Sharon-la-fin-d-un-criminel-de-guerre )
en réponse à https://sammyfisherjr.net/Shaarli/?74SZFQ